WebJan 5, 2014 · If FLRA persists in overturning Agency Head Review determinations, Agencies are on notice to appeal to a receptive court. I’ve written before about the FLRA’s “sneaky” approach to avoiding a determination that a proposal is “permissive”. The Court has indicated a suspicion of that approach which may provide arguments for Agency reps. WebNov 30, 2024 · The Republican members of the FLRA ruled that before an expiring union contract can remain in force while parties negotiate a new contract, it must be subject to agency head review. Like the other decisions, this one was made in a vacuum, without the benefit of a real-world contract issue.
[Decision Number] FLRA - Federal Labor Relations Authority
Agency head review can give an agency two bites at the apple. The bargainers at the table can agree to a proposal that was a part of an agreed upon package to achieve agreement. However, the agency head then declares a specific union proposal, which was the linchpin of the agreement, non … See more The good of agency head review relates to the initial enactment of the Statute in 1978. The Statute is a very complex approach to collective bargaining. … See more The quality of agency head review varies considerably between agencies. Some agencies do an excellent job of reviewing collective bargaining … See more There can be considerable abuse of agency head review. It is not infrequent that the agency head disapproves a collective bargaining agreement without providing any … See more WebNov 17, 2011 · Agency Head review is a basic statutory right in the labor relations … cynthia binns
Agency Head Review – The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
WebThe FLRA administers the labor-management relations program for 2.1 million non … WebAgency Head Review (AHR) is the statutory requirement that all negotiated agreements … WebJan 31, 1994 · When the Agreement was presented for review to the head of the National Guard Bureau ("Agency"), the Agency head disapproved the agreement, inter alia, on the basis that the clause pertaining to civilian attire violated "applicable law," 5 U.S.C. § 7114(c)(2), because it infringed upon management's reserved rights to "determine . . . … cynthia binger